Essay on conflicting perspectives ted hughes

The Marxist and Functionalist Perspectives on the Family

For the purpose of this essay question I will discuss the Marxist and
the Functionalist perspectives on the Family. I will compare and
contrast them and give a critical analysis of each and place them in
historical context as well as modern day. In Britain today there are
many different types of families. A social unit living together
defines what a family is. The family resembles the core feature of
society. Both Marxist and Functionalist perspectives believe the
family is what holds society together and helps socialise the future
generations.

There are three types of family existing in today’s society. The
nuclear family resembles a family unit made up of no more than two
generations, stereotyped as a mother, father and children. The
extended family refers to a family unit made of many three generations
or more who live with each other or near by. This type is typical of
pre-industrial or ‘primitive’ societies. The third type of family is
the reconstituted. This type has become more apparent in modern day
society. It refers to adults who have married before and have brought
their children from the first marriage to the second, creating a new
family unit. It is important to note that not every household includes
a family – for example student flats.

The functionalist perspective believe society is like a machine in
that all its institutions sustain continuity and consensus and keep
society running smoothly. Functionalists believe the family
contributes to society’s basic needs and helps maintain social order.
Functionalists have been criticised for placing too much ...


... middle of paper ...


...e into existence with the invention of private property. Both
Murdock and Parsons paint a very ‘rosy’ picture of family life. They
fail to take in account the darker side of society and family issues
such as domestic abuse etc. Parsons views on men and women in
relationships are often out dated. A lot of women these days are the
breadwinners in the family and therefore the husband and wife roles
have been reversed. Functionalist do not recognise that women suffer
from the sexual division of labour while Marxists highlight this is
their theory. Marxists also come under scrutiny for exaggerating the
importance of the family life as being a refuge from the capitalist
society. Marxists also underestimate darker issues such as violence
within the home etc. Zaretsky overemphasises the fact that family and
work are separated.
Read Full Essay Click the button above to view the complete essay, speech, term paper, or research paper

Briefly state your position, state why the problem you are working on is important, and indicate the important questions that need to be answered; this is your "Introduction." Push quickly through this draft--don't worry about spelling, don't search for exactly the right word, don't hassle yourself with grammar, don't worry overmuch about sequence--that's why this is called a "rough draft." Deal with these during your revisions. The point of a rough draft is to get your ideas on paper. Once they are there, you can deal with the superficial (though very important) problems.

Essay on conflicting perspectives ted hughes

essay on conflicting perspectives ted hughes

Media:

essay on conflicting perspectives ted hughesessay on conflicting perspectives ted hughesessay on conflicting perspectives ted hughesessay on conflicting perspectives ted hughes